PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Barber <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 30 Mar 2002 07:24:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
>>Tom Bridgeland wrote: I read somewhere once that some scientist measured
the mercury in fish before the industrial age (I don't recall how) and found
no difference.

Back in 1972 the state of New York issued a warning about mercury
contamination in the food fish caught in Lake Champlain. They (If I remember
correctly) banned the eating of some species and recommended limitations on
others. A few years later they rescinded everything. Seems that newer more
sensitive tests were skewing the data. When they tested dinosaur bones at
the Museum of Natural History they found high concentrations of mercury.

Tom Barber

ATOM RSS1 RSS2