Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:02:25 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Judy Genova wrote:
> Trish and others:
>
> My vision for a paleo "tribal community" does not necessarily mean commune.
> A piece of land could be shared, and individuals and families could each
> inhabit their own home, yurt, cabin, etc.
>
> What would define this group as a tribe, would be the interdependence the
> members would have between each other for economic and physical survival.
> This is what differentiates a tribe from merely a cluster of houses on a
> mutual piece of land, such as Ecological Villages. It does not mean that
> members sleep with each others wives (tho' I'm sure that has been the basis
> for many intra-tribal wars..), as sometimes people think when they hear the
> word commune. It does not mean that everyone has to eat off the same plate.
Your vision sounds very appealing to me. There are a lot of steps between
the idea and the actuality, but I would be interested in participating in the
process.
Lynnet
|
|
|