BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Preservationist Protection Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mary Krugman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:16:11 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Preservationist Protection Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
In a message dated 6/14/2001 6:30:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Personally, I never heard of waxing stone, and am willing to bet it's not a
>  good idea (trapping water behind the wax would be disadvantageous and
>  counterproductive), but you can ask.

I understand that Trinity Church nr. Wall Street was once coated with wax
(which attracted a lot of surface dirt -- hence the black color) for many
years. It was cleaned not too many years ago, the wax and dirt removed. It is
now the original pinky-brown sandstone of the Upjohn design. I have not
confirmed this story, however -- take it for what it's worth.

Mary

ATOM RSS1 RSS2