BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Callan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:21:15 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
The Mac users don't have to be awake to keep up.  Sometimes they just get tired
and let the misguided have their way with the world...sort of like the masonry
cleaning work you describe.

-jc

Met History wrote:

> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> << the philosophical quagmire that is the definition of "clean" when it comes
> to buildings >>
>
> Well, I don't think clean needs to be defined, in this case: the limestone
> base of this building (the N.Y. Athletic Club)  looks worse than it did
> before.  Spotchy, burned, abraded, chemical.   Does anyone think it looks
> better?  (I almost said "does anyone think different?" but I realized it
> would wake up the Mac users).
>
> Sign me,  Wow, Why Do They Always Feel They Have To Back Up Ralph???

ATOM RSS1 RSS2