Walt, I was just looking at the item quoted earlier in this thread, and from
where I sat, it seemed a complete contradiction, both to what I have grown
up with and what everyone on here has said, this is why I put up my original
post.
I'll have to look at them again, to see what I missed, but that was the way
I saw it, when I read it. Then.
--
MAILTO:[log in to unmask]
HTTP://LISTENTOHEAR.CO.UK
g0gku/k1hbj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: operating procedures


> Henry -
>
> I don't understand your thinking.  It requires little intelligence to obey
> written rules and at least over here, the rules are quite clear and
> there's no need for the kind of abstruse interpretive processes you seem
> to think they demand.  A ham is licensed for certain specific modes of
> operation at certain power levels within certain frequencies and that's
> how they can operate legally.  What's so difficult about this concept?
>
> --
> Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> [log in to unmask]