On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Phosphor wrote:

> > I'll have to take your word that this was his argument; I don't
> > feel like going back over it.  I didn't follow that argument very
> > closely, since I already knew the gist of it, that reliance on
> > kangaroo alone for any length of time would entail discarding
> > large amount of uneaten kangaroo meat.
>
> I suppose this is the closest you will come to saying Amadeus had absolutely
> no point at all. NONE.  He is to be pitied for his self-delusions.

If that's how you read what I wrote, then I guess that's an end
of it.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]