Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:20:30 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are heading for 6 billion. We've passed 5 billion last year.
P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: What if Everyone Did It?
> >One issue that I've not seen discussed is the idea of whether and to what
> >degree
> >the paleo diet would be sustainable if all the people on this planet
> >decided to
> >follow it. I know that it takes something like ten to twenty times more
land
> >for a hunter gatherer than for a farmer.
>
> I'm not sure about that statistic. But also, H-G's can live on land that
> is unsuitable for agriculture, so there's a lot more acreage available.
>
> But there's another solution, which for some reason no one talks
> about. Who says we need 3 billion people? ALL of our environmental
> problems would be much easier to solve if there weren't so many of us. --
> and hey, I am NOT advocating mass killing or starvation! All that's
> necessary is a slight reduction in the average children-per-family. Well,
> okay: in some countries, it might be a fairly large reduction.
> Any of you who've read the "Ishmael" books are familiar with some other
> ideas related to this. It may turn out to be the ultimate solution, in
the
> sense that if we don't do that, nothing else will really help.
>
>
|
|
|