PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ingrid Bauer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:55:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
-

>Does that mean that cashews are not legumes?

they are not legumes they are from  Anacardiaceae familly  ( anacardium
giganteum or occidentale.)

it is a ver particular nut that is growing outside of the edible fleshy
fruit that support them. ( cashew apple )
the shell of the nut contains little pockets of very toxic oil that can burn
the skin. they are very delicate to open without spilling the oil everywhere
. It is why the industry used heavy processing with high heat and chemical
solvents.
The indian children are more clever they bury them then come back to eat
them sprouted at the mousson time .
jean-claude
>Do they still have harmful lectins?
>Enid
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ingrid Bauer" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2001 12:40 AM
>Subject: Re: [P-F] Newbie intro...
>
>
>> >> The reasoning is faulty.  Peanuts and cashews are edible raw.
>> >
>> >But, they are legumes. Aren't all legumes ruled out regardless of
>> edibility?
>>
>> only peanuts is in the legume familly .
>>
>> jean-claude
>> .
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2