>****There is a great flaw here if the numbers were intended
>to be 0.6 and 0.3 respectively! As no honest scientist
>would use blank dot six; or blank dot 3 to represent
>0.3 and 0.6! so you may see how easily you may be taken in
>by garbage science, some reporter has repeated the data to
>support her agenda!....
The difference between 78
>and 77.65 is ZERO! As in science we use the same degree
>of difference. Therefore the numbers are rigged! Most
>probably to support the agenda of the reporter! ...
>So you see how easy the political lie is presented to us.
>And if we are not numerically aware we may be misled by this
>type of manipulation!
>
>Finally the writer who blessed us with this astonishing
>information failed to mention that these differences are
>most probably too small to be of any use!
what kind of agenda, do you think, led those peoples to fool themselves or
others?
jean-claude