INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jacques Dehée <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:48:29 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  Cristian, inventar un false defecto
  a nostre Interlingua non es honeste
  e exponer iste false defecto in INTERLNG
  que debe contribuer a promover nostre lingua
  es duplemente dishoneste.

  Interlingua non ha un « non equilibrio »
  como pretende Pawel pro promover ido in INTERLNG.

  Omne linguas ha differentias de frequentia
  de sus litteras.
  Un equalitate de frequentia serea artificial
  e sin interesse.

  Per exemplo, in francese E, S, A, R, I, N, T, U, L, O
  son in un ordine discrescente le dece litteras
  le plus frequente.

  Si le litteras in Interlingua haberea le mesme frequentia,
  Interlingua non serea natural.

  Interlingua per su prototypos e su characteristicas
  es le juste quintessentia del linguas de controlo.

  Amicalmente,

  Jacques

  !!!!!!!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2