Rick, this one deserves an honest and candid response.
Stay tuned.  I'll be back.

Rudy
.
.
.
> Rudy,
>
> Actually, if the Commission were to be accused of bias, it would fall on
> the side of the disabled.  Trivial cases don't get far, but I gather not
> many employers face the Tribunal successfully.  It is investigator,
> judge and jury, rolled into one.  Their big problem is not enough
> investigators.
>
> Rick
>
>
> Rudy Caris wrote:
> >
> > A classical case of where "the one hand knows exactly
> > what the other hand is doing."  Hummm.  So, "who watches
> > the watchers" Rick?  Or who decides what color fox to
> > leave in the chicken coop?  And for that matter, which
> > chicken gets eaten today?
> >
> > Rudy
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > > The difference here might be the fact we don't have access to the ADA.
> > > As a Canadian, our source is the Federal and Provincial Human Rights
> > > Commissions.  The good thing is, its an arm of the government. The bad
> > > thing is, also, that its an arm of the government.