In deciding between a NVidia GeForce II MX, such as Asus V7100, and
Matrox Millennium G450, at about the same price, for a new build, I read
the dual monitor output of the GeForce II MX isn't that great. Can anyone
comment on that for a GeForce II MX card, particularly compared to the
Matrox G450? While I recognize the NVidia's superior 3D performance, as I
am not a gamer, I would put dual display performance ahead of 3D
performance, if I have to choose.

Demetri Kolokotronis
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

              The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
                     support at our newest website:
                          http://freepctech.com