Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2000 21:54:31 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The Celeron processor, in general, is not as suited to very intensive
computing tasks, i.e. digital video, Photoshop, and 3D rendering.
That said, I don't have any real reservations about the Celeron, for
business applications especially. Word processing, spreadsheets, and web
browsing don't seem to see performance reduction.
I have a PentiumIII 500 as a desktop machine, and a Celeron 400 as a
laptop, and don't see much, if any difference in application launching
speed, or how fast a web page appears. The machines have the same 128 MB
of memory.
So, unless you're doing lots of video/3D work, go with the Celeron.
Just my $.02.
Glen Sagers
Cindy Meyer wrote:
> Hi
>
> I apologize ahead of time if this question is not suited for this list.
> We are looking at buying a large volume (70) of new computers. I've
> notice on micronpc.com that if you choose a Celeron processor over a
> Pentium, you can save upwards of $100 per computer. We have always
> stuck to Dell computers with Pentium processors so my question is
> whether buying a computer with a Celeron processor will make a notable
> difference in performance. What are the opinions of this list on
> Celeron vs. Pentium?
>
> --
> Cindy Meyer
> Computer Technician
> La Crosse Public Library
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
> Digest mode - visit our web site:
> http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
Digest mode - visit our web site:
http://nospin.com/pc/pcbuild.html
|
|
|