Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 22 Dec 2001 20:36:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you Chuck.
I was thinking about a CC Radio, but the only person that says anything good
about it is:
Art Bell.
I'll take a 2010 any day.
Also, I have a G E super radio 2 and, I like it.
What is the difference between the GE2 & GE3?
And, don't forget about the YACHTBOY 400. I own one and its right up there
with the 2010.
73 DE ANTHONY W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "chuck lunkley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:53 PM
Subject: gesuperadio
> I have owned 3 sangean radios and 6 ge super radios. I realise that much
> of the preferences between the two is based on personal opinion. I have
> owned ge super radios for the last 25 years and the circuity has not
> changed appreciably. Why change something that is already good? I have
> taken apart the ge and examined the componets and have compared
performance
> and construction with the sangean cc radio.
> 1. I prefer the fine direct tunning charactericts of the analog ge and it
> is constructed with ganged capacitance tunning. This affords great
> selectivity.
> The cc radio is typical of most pll tunning recvrs. The shut out
> threshold tends to drop very weak stations.
>
> 2. The price of the ge is a third of the cc radio. When they advertise
> the cc radio as much as they do it is built into the price.
> 3. The ge does not have the feel or appearance of a slick modern rcvr,
but
> it is burly and durible. The cc radio has problems in this respect.
> 4. The built in ac conversion in the ge is so much more convinent than
the
> outboard adapter of the sangean.
> These are just a few of my observations for what they are worth.
> Thanks Chuck, ki6hk
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|