BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Royal Order of Lacunae Pluggers <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:42:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Ralph,

If you read the online manual you will quickly see the Marine Corp advice on the
moving of a tank through interior non-load bearing partitions -- they make their
own field of fire as needed. As a large element of historic preservation has to
do with the perception of the occupants and users of the property I simply
thought it interesting to see what perceptions the military has of a building.
The diagrams they use show what some of us may consider historic structures...
and their main concern seems to be strong points (pilasters) and recognition of
load-bearing walls as opposed to non-load bearing walls. Their take on terra
cotta appears to be that it is a quickly disposable element.

Best,
][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2