Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:11:45 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:46:57 -0800, David Lewandowski
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
... i wrote..
>>My second thought is not the desires is what satisfies us,
>>but satisfying the desires - is satisfaction.
>>Could be more difficult with more desires.
>>Just a thought.
David:
>Do you have a desire to be buried if you eat tubers? Do you have a desire
>to become nutty from consuming nuts?
The "desires" topic doesn't relate to bears having had desires or not.
It's just a kind of classification according to Hildegards visions on food.
What would be a desire, say with food: I like cake so much but i shouldn't
eat it and it makes me fat. --> I think the desire woun't make you any
happier.
Or if you have strong desire for a ... fast car...
fulfilling the desire *could* make you happier, but as long as you cannot
fulfill your desire, you won't be happier with it. More unhapy in longing
for it.
I mean this kind of desires Hildegard ment, would be increased by bears
meat. Who could confirm about this? I don't know anybody else who's eatin
bear, but you. ...
regards
Amadeus S.
... said the (very) old man, looking onto a nice youg girl:
oh Lord, you have taken the *ability* away from me.
please now take away also the *wanting* .......
|
|
|