BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"Think about it: do you really __want__ Face Recognition Software?" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: B-P problem - is it just me?
From:
Ruth Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:42:03 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
"Think about it: do you really __want__ Face Recognition Software?" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
Not me.  Ruth



At 8:41 AM -0400 10/26/01, Met History wrote:
For a month or so, my incoming BP no longer has the old "reply to
B-P.etc.etc."  It only has the original senders address.  So, to take one
example, Ralph's complaints go to only one person, not many >>>unless you
manually insert the [log in to unmask] <<<  listserv
address.

I -- included in the star chamber of "list owners" have checked the list
configurations, and everything seems to be normal.   But an initial survey
indicates others are having this problem, too.  Is everyone?

Christopher Gray

--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT

ATOM RSS1 RSS2