Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 15 Oct 2000 15:35:01 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks for your reponse. I do have DX7(actually 7.0a). I don't have the
original drivers for the card, it came as a bare board. The card locks the
system even at low color depths/resolution. I do think the chip on the
board runs too hot, although this is the first acclerator I have used from
ATI. I have a Matrox G400 on a BX machine that runs fine. So I am assuming
there is a problem with the video card, or it doesn't like an LX chipset.
The vendor said the chip does run hot, but not "real" hot - whatever that
means. I sort of follow the old rule of thumb, that if you can't hold your
finger on the chip for at least 5 seconds it is too hot. I suppose I will
return the card, and look for something else comparable, although I don't
really need a heavy gaming card, just good 2D and decent 3D. I got the ATI
because of the low price.
Edna Sloan
Some of the ATI cards using the newest drivers have to have DirectX 7.0
>installed to work correctly with 16bit or higher color depth. This is
>the only brand I know of that has to have DirectX loaded just to work
>on some of there models!! The other option is to reload the driver that
>came with the card. If the driver's over a year old it does not require
>DX7 to run high color depth. Most of my customers only update their
>DirectX files to run the newest games or multimedia but ATI really
>blundered on this one. Even download.com's ATI driver file page lists
>over 20 bad reviews from individuals updating the same drivers - I
>suspect most of them didn't notice the mandatory DirectX 7.0
>requirement to use the driver.
>
>Good Luck
>-yui
The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
Visit our web site to signup: http://nospin.com
|
|
|