Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua |
Date: | Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:15:58 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 07:57:32 +1000, Edo Neilson <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Salute!
>
>Emerson RZ ha scribite:
>
>>"Somos le major polluetor (?) del mundo, ...."
>
>Io ha trovate in le IED:
>tribuer [tribu-/tribut-] e
>polluer [-lu-/-lut-]
>
>Le principal formationes del verbo 'distribuer' son:
>distribuer > distribute > distribution > distributor
>
>Inde, le principal formationes del verbo 'polluer' serea:
>polluer > pollute > pollution > pollutor
Claro, ma "polluitor" es alsi acceptabile, secundo me. Tal formas gemino es
satis frequente in interlingua: "scriptor"/"scribitor", "factor"/"facitor",
etc. Le un es forsan plus recognoscibile, le altere plus regular.
>A proposito, an 'editor' e 'processor' non serea preferibile a 'editator' e
>'processator' que io ha legite in messages recente?
De accordo, ma le formas in -ator es certo non incorrecte. Tal formationes
ultraregular es utile pro expression spontanee, e dunque incoragiabile.
Chris
|
|
|