In response to Jack Payton's post. Reason I have two large hard drives,
is this: when you go and buy one knowadays, the best price break is
around 30 to 40gig. You have a hard time even finding a small drive, at bestbuy
or compUSA. The 40gig drive only cost me $99 bucks. Drives are Cheap
and I use many different graphical programs.
Answer to query 2: I am a power user. I like different OS. I have win98SE
right now, and I won the winME in a drawing. I realize XP is coming out,
and I would like to make room for the OSs in my partitioning scheme,
sure later on, I may decide to dump the older windoze OSs from the other
partitions, but I would like to have the space to try.
Most of the ME users find that having win98SE to fall back on in case of
3rd party software not working, is a good thing. One lady wrote to me and
said her camera would no longer work in ME, so just for that one reason,
she went back to win98SE. Seems kinda bad to have an important media
item like a camera, not work in ME. I have been told that manufacturers are
skipping drivers for ME, instead working on drivers for XP, yet another reason
to have all these OSs installed.
I do not have XP yet, but I want room for it.
Query number 3: Performance and data integrity is an issue. I have been told
to partition for this reason. Performance can be increased by manipulating the
swap files for the OSs. Also having backup, application and data partitions is
good for data integrity.
If you do not have Partition Magic 6, I suggest you try it. It is most
excellent
for partitioning, it makes it so easy.
Susan Stubbs
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack R Payton
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] partitioning questions
Susan:
[My questions are mostly rhetorical, requiring no email answer.]
It seems you want to make things more complicated than they are. You have
a 30G plus a 40G HDD? Unless you have a tremendous, professional need for
HDD space, you seem to have a huge overkill. As I understand it, only
extensive 3D graphics, music CD creation, and/or film/video editing would
require 70G of HDD. (I expect to do much of the same on one 17G HDD.)
Why do you want to run WinME and/or Win98SE along with the forthcoming
WinXP? WinXP should replace both WinME and Win NTx, combining the best of
both plus upgrades. Most reviewers of the WinXP Beta seem to agree that
WinXP will be more stable than WinME and add features not available in
WinNT.
So, why worry about a multible boot? You may have a reason to dual boot
between WinXP and Linux, but what else?
I don't use either Linux OS or Partition Magic (any version), but if you
want to use Linux simultaneously with any version of Windows, why not use
one HDD (minimum 30G) for each?
We dumped Win98SE (as we did all of its predecessors back to Win3.0) for
WinME. ME has proven more stable and has some added features. We miss
some of SE's intrinsic help & troubleshooting programs/features - most of
which are now available online - but on balance, we prefer WinME, and are
looking forward to XP.
I can't advise on boot partitions for multiple OS, but for a single Winxx
OS, I'd recommend 2.0-2.5G as a basic logical HDD partition for
Windows-xx (larger, if you keep your Win Swapfile on the boot drive), and
the rest to suit your needs. If you really need to install both Linux AND
Windows, why not install one on your 30G and one on your 40G?
You said that "250mb was not enough for an OS." No doubt. WinME typically
requires 1.5G minimum for OS and a swap file.
Jack
Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
http://freepctech.com
Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
http://freepctech.com
|
