PSYCHOAN Archives

Psychoanalysis

PSYCHOAN@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Howard Eisman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Psychoanalysis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:27:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I am gratified with the lively discussion following my original posting.
I will respond to some of them shortly.

Meanwhile, just a note on Freud's language. I did a bit of translating
of Freud from German into English in my student days, and I, too, was
impressed on how fluent, conversational German was changed into formal,
stilted, and jargon ridden English. But I do not believe that blaming
the American medical establishment for this is appropriate.

It must be noted that Freud spoke fluent English; he was very much
involved in selecting translators, and, I believe (I am not that sure of
this), had an ongoing involvement in the translations as they were
written.

Howard D. Eisman, Ph.D.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2