Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 28 May 2001 16:08:13 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In the strictest sense a router is not a substitute for a hub. You are
thinking of a switch. A hub works by broadcasting all packets to all nodes
on the network. Nodes listen to the lan for all packets, searching for ones
with their address. A switch keeps a table of all the node addresses and,
after interrogating each packet, routes it only to the destination node.
There is a lot more that switches do, but this one feature is a significant
improvement over hubs. This results in much less traffic on the net. You
would likely see no noteworthy improvement on a 3 node network on which you
are playing games, since each node is likely to be interested in seeing all
game packets all the time anyway.
Tom Turak
-----Original Message-----
From: jimx9 [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 11:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCBUILD] router vs hub
Hi,
My brother and I are trying to upgrade our network system. We have three
computers hooked via a hub. We mainly use the network for lan gaming. I
always thought a router was more for sharing a connection amongst the
machines - like a cable modem connection or dsl; a hub was mainly for what
we have set up now. Which is better for our purpose - and which is faster?
Advantages vs. disadvantages...
Thanks,
James M. Esham
The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
Visit our web site to signup: http://freepctech.com
PCBUILD maintains hundreds of useful files for download
visit our download web page at:
http://freepctech.com/downloads.shtml
|
|
|