>Having said that, it's shocking to me that people are designing their
eating
>lives around 70-year old, nonreproducible science. The leucocytosis study
>would appear to be trivial to try to redo. But more to the point, white
>blood cell count is an extremely crude biomarker. Biochemistry has
advanced
>incredibly in the last 70 years. To gamble one's health on such poor
>science seems unwise to me.
so what those 70 years gave us , as informations about the difference
, in
nature and effects, between cooked and raw foods?
jean-claude