>Yes. Please. Will all the dog owners here please subscribe to a BARF list
>and discuss your dog feeding there and not here. The volume of this list is
>high enough without having to wade through posts that have nothing to do
>with the human paleo diet.
>
>Don.
While I can see why one might be a tad uninterested in posts referring only
to dogs, there is a huge correlation between dogs and humans re
prototypical dietary needs. Also, many of us were first exposed to Paleo
principles via our search for help with our dogs. Thus I, for one, find
dog-related posts more topical than, say, posts on tubers, chocolate,
microwaves, homeopathy, and any number of fascinating sideways excursions
this community makes.
There are a number of topics I'd like to see more on, if anyone cares:
lectins, legumes and the suitability thereof, truly raw eating, sprouts,
raw fish...
However, please excuse me for pushing list guidelines. I must have missed
your appointment as list owner.
BTW, I am on four BARF lists, one of which generates well over 100 messages
each day. You should worry about volume...
ginny and Tomo, who teach each other how to eat
All stunts performed without a net!
|