BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Preservationist Protection Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:44:45 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Why, physically or chemically, is old tile (c. 1895-1930) so different from
"modern" tile, even so-called "period" repro-tile (at least what I have seen
in tile stores).

The older tile has a transparent, glassy surface, with much greater
translucence.  And it has those nice, sharp-right-angle edges (which require
very tight joints), instead of the curved-in edges (which gives setters a lot
of room to fudge).

Christopher Gray
Office for Metropolitan History
246 West 80th Street, #8, NYC  10024
212-799-0520  fax -0542
e: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2