Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 13:36:15 -0800 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
More confusion about Cordain's ratios:
> Paleolithic: fat-22% protein-37% carbohydrate-41%
And
> % Plant % Animal
> Median 16-25% 76-85%
Don't really seem to add up. Are there some "high
carbohydrate" animals I don't know about? Either that,
or the plant foods must all be high sugar fruits?
Based on 3000 calories, the ratios broken down
according to the F-P-C % would be 660, 1110, 1230
respectively. Using (the original article's) 65%
animal, 35% plant = 1950 + 1050. Using 75% animal, 25%
plant = 2250 + 750. Using 85% animal, 15% plant = 2550
+ 450. I don't see how any of these, with *perhaps*
the exception of the 65/35 ratio, can possibly come
close to 1230 carb calories. Especially if any kind of
nut is included among the plant foods.
Can organ meats supply *that* much carbohydrate?
Can anyone clear this up for me?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
|
|
|