INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kjell Rehnstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:54:44 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"INTERLNG: Discussiones in Interlingua" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Lo que parla in favor de _ci_ non es tanto o solo
le facto que illo pote esser substituite per le
favoritos _aqui_ de Stan, que pro un persona qui
sape linguas moderne romance es multo tentante,
sed in plus pro isto que illo crea un association
al cis- Alpin, cis-Jordanic etc. Cata scholar qui
apprende historia del antiquitate, apprende del
Gallia cisalpin, e nos ha transalpin. Ci(s) face
per altere parola un parte integrante in le
vocabulario international, e il es multo probabile
que illes qui vole crear un nomine international
va usar lo pro parolosa como _Cisandin_,
Cisoceanic etc.

Cellus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2