RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lynton Blair <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Mar 1999 23:22:35 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
I agree with Kate; or maybe he should be "bumped" ( no this is not a
misprint, I did NOT mean humped !)

Lynton

At 02:29 PM 3/11/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I must admit that I have gotten to the point of just deleting Alan's replies
>to this forum, without even the least bit of curiosity to see what he has to
>say.
>
>Cheers.
>
>Kate
>
>
>Alan responded,
>> I don't quite know what you are getting at..as I have never yet
>> addressed cooked meat as a cause of cancer at all in this list.
>> A holiday in the Bahamas to anybody in here who can proove that
>> I did. Be fair Liza. If I stated that women tend to get more
>> overemotional and distort facts (which you have proven here) you
>> would probably call me sexist (I'd bet my bottom dollar that
>> Kirt is also a woman BTW). ;-)
>
>
>P.S. I too believe that he owes Lisa an apology for the cooked meat remark.
>Actually I think he owes all of the women an apology for his remarks.
>Perhaps he should consider a cooling off period before posting.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2