Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 01:55:44 -0700 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Ethan Matthews! At 09:35 AM 7/29/01 -0500 you wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:53:18 +1000, Ultra <[log in to unmask]> posted article
><003a01c116a3$7deed910$50fa36cb@Master>, which said:
>
>> win2k should be a better platform for video editing (no 2G file size
>> limit as win9x does).
>
>Ahhh, that explains why I can't edit 2.1 gigabyte video clips! I had no
>idea Win98 had a limit on file size. :-) Incidentally, I could PLAY the raw
>AVI video clip with Windows Media Player, but when I tried to edit and save
>the file, I got errors on anything over 2 gigs. I wonder why I could play
>the file, but not edit it, and how was my video capture card "allowed" to
>write such a large file in the first place?
You can save this file! if it is mpeg1.
You can do that, using tmpg encoder and reducing the bitrating a little .
But it will work a long time (around 3 hours on 1GHz computer).
This is just what I did yesterday <g>.
--
Stanislav Rabinovich
PCBUILD's List Owners:
Bob Wright<[log in to unmask]>
Drew Dunn<[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|