BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"BP - \"lapsit exillas\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 May 2000 20:55:50 -0700
Reply-To:
"BP - \"lapsit exillas\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ruth Barton <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Comments:
SoVerNet Verification (on garnet.sover.net) [209.198.117.85] from arc5a275.bf.sover.net [209.198.117.85] 209.198.117.85 Tue, 23 May 2000 22:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Why do you city folks wantuh paint yer winders, don't ya wantuh see
owt?  Or do yu mean just the sash?  Ruth



At 1:45 PM -0400 5/23/00, Mary Dierickx wrote:
>Regarding Landmarks policy on sash colors:
>
>In my recent experience, Landmarks staff has been asking for original or
>similar paint colors.  On an Upper West Side rowhouse, the staff asked for a
>light color, closer to the color of the limestone, rather than black.  I
>agree with Eric, if we insisted on the existing black, they would have
>accepted it.
>
>We didn't need to do a paint analysis in this case and I don't believe
>Landmarks will require paint investigation unless you want something from
>them.  We did it to get aluminum windows in a tenement in Greenwich Village
>(it already had aluminum windows).  The sash was brownstone color.
>
>I think it's interesting and a good idea to move away from basic black.  For
>years everyone just said "paint it black," it was easy and understandable to
>owners and contractors.  Many of windows on those classical, early 20th
>century buildings were light colored.  This will bring the way these
>buildings look closer to the original designs.  It will also allow for more
>variety in historic districts, which need more variety.
>
>In this vein, I don't see why upper floor awnings on the Haughwout building
>in SoHo are so bad (NYT Real Estate page article last Sunday).  Broadway was
>a messier street in 1900, with signs and awnings everywhere. Preservationists
>shouldn't be neat freaks.
>
>Mary Dierickx, NYC

--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT

ATOM RSS1 RSS2