Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Apr 2001 22:55:53 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 11:19 AM 4/6/01 -0400, you wrote:
>In deciding between a NVidia GeForce II MX, such as Asus V7100, and
>Matrox Millennium G450, at about the same price, for a new build, I read
>the dual monitor output of the GeForce II MX isn't that great. Can anyone
>comment on that for a GeForce II MX card, particularly compared to the
>Matrox G450? While I recognize the NVidia's superior 3D performance, as I
>am not a gamer, I would put dual display performance ahead of 3D
>performance, if I have to choose.
>
I think it is save to say that there is no one that has the two head
advantage over Matrox. And boy do they have a killer card coming out later
this year!
David Ray
The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
support at our newest website:
http://freepctech.com
|
|
|