BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Chapel of the unPowered nailers." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Cedar vs. Copper
From:
Leland Torrence <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:37:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Chapel of the unPowered nailers." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Architect Donald Baerman did a paper on the cedar/copper issue.
203-288-8911.
Best,
Leland

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Follett" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 8:43 AM
Subject: Cedar vs. Copper


> In a message dated 1/16/01 10:38:45 PM Central Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> << (Anyone find any documentation of the Cedar vs. Copper issue?) >>
>
> Not me.
> How is that for noise?
>
> Sorry,
> ][<en
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2