BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Go preserve a yurt, why don'tcha." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ralph Walter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:47:12 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Go preserve a yurt, why don'tcha." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
No, DEb,

They didn't teach the golden mean in architorture school when I was thereAriz
State) in the early-mid 70's.  It certainly wasn't mentioned in design
studio, and I don't remember it having been discussed in arch'l history.  In
fact, the classical approach was so out of fashion that one of the studio
critics used to say "Symmetry is dead," and nobody objected.  Genius that I
was,  I somehow knew he was full of shit about that, but since that
particular teacher was a particular doofus, it wasn't as if anybody I
respected said anything so distressing.

Then again, one would have a hard time looking at Queen Anne or Eastlake
buildings and finding symmetry..  Personally, I've always considered the
golden mean and similar design rules as more than a little suspect, and been
very dubious when people claim to have found it in existing buildings (other
than the Parthenon, et al).

Contributing less than my 2 cents worth once again, I remain,

Ralph

ATOM RSS1 RSS2