Sender: |
|
Mime-version: |
1.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:24:08 -1000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
jean-claude;
> no foods is harmless,harmfull or beneficial in it self ,only our
> relationship to it depending on time and situation ,can be whatever!
Or: Foods are harmless, harmful or beneficial in themselves...
> we are only an instable stable micocosm inside a permanently fluctuating
> macrocosm.
Or: we are only a homeostatic-seeking microcosm inside a permanently
fluctuating homeostatic-seeking macrocosm.
>forget about grasping any of that thru discriminative
> judgements.
Or: Forget about grasping any of that through instinct, which is lost, more
or less, to generations of "degeneration" and/or decades discriminative
judgements...
> At best it is useless.
Or: At best it is is useful.
> be ready for an insecure ride!
Or: Be ready for an insecure ride on a rollarcoaster constructed of
neocortical thought, which is not subtractable. What a lovely ride!
> just sincerely ask the question :what is right for me to eat , here and
> now?.
Or: Just sincerely unask the question: what is right for me to eat , here
and now?
> you will be amaze how much you can know without a doubt that way.
Or: You will be amazed how much you can know with a doubt that way.
Doubt (questioning the basis of a proof) is the basis of science; faith
(belief in the absence of proof) is the basis of religion. Two edges or the
same coin, no?
Cheers (or frowns) ((or the edge of the coin)), ;)
Kirt
|
|
|