RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
François Dovat <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2002 16:34:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: origins of the organic movement: new book


> But we should also keep in mind that it is possible for different people
to
> come up with the same idea independently.  An earlier example is not
always
> the source of a later one.  I know nothing of the stuff below; I just had
to
> throw that comment into the mix...
>
> C
>
I totally agree. I know Burger. I know very well another of the 3 first guys
to experiment instinctive nutrition back in the 60s. This guy knows Burger
much better than allmost anyone and he's *not* in a good relationship with
him now. Together they started to think and experiment. It appears,
according to this guy, that the discoverer of the theory is Burger. He's
sufficiently clever to have found it by his own, not in searching in ancient
litterature. If it would be the case, this guy would for sure know it and
make use of it.
Even if these ancients books may have said something about our food instinct
( but to my limited knowledge they don't ), none could know enough at the
time about biochemistry and immunology to put up such a coherent theory
including a new revolutionnary approach of the viral phenomeneon and all.

François

ATOM RSS1 RSS2