RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Ross <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:01:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Hi Liza,

And if I remember correctly, except for bananas and the few dried fruits
that have been evaluated, most fruits have a reasonable glycemic index, more
reasonable than many grain products and potatoes.

david

----- Original Message -----
From: Burton, Kate <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: More Bad News for Fruitarians


> Hi Lisa,
>
> Not necesarily More Bad News for Fruitarians
>
> Would the fact that the people in the study most probably eat a wider
range
> of food, and may not be fruitarians, have anything to do with the study
> results? Does the body behave differently when eating only raw or mostly
> raw?
>
> Peace,
>
> Kate
>
>
> Reference: Frost, G., Leeds, A. et al. 1999.
> Glycaemic index as a determinant of serum HDL-cholesterol concentration.
> Lancet 353(9158):1045-1048.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2