RAW-FOOD Archives

Raw Food Diet Support List

RAW-FOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Dec 2001 07:09:34 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
When I tried to read the article, page 4 crashed my browser.  Did this
happen to anyone else?

C


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raw Food Diet Support List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Blake Graham
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:21 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Organic Foods Documented More Nutritious!!
>
>
> Subject: Organic Foods Documented=20
> More Nutritious!!=20
>
> A recently published review of 41 scientific studies from countries=20
> around the world comparing the nutrition of organic and=20
> conventionally grown foods found significantly higher nutrients in=20
> organic crops.=20
>
> "Nutritional Quality of Organic Versus Conventional Fruits,=20
> Vegetables, and Grains", published in The Journal of Alternative=20
> and Complimentary Medicine, found organic crops, on average,=20
> contained 29.3% more magnesium, 27% more vitamin C, 21% more=20
> iron, 13.6% more phosphorus, 26% more calcium, 11% more copper,=20
> 42% more manganese, 9% more potassium and 15% lower nitrates.=20
> In crops such as spinach, lettuce, cabbage and potatoes, organically=20
> grown crops showed even higher nutritional superiority.
>
> The entire document may be read or downloaded at:=20
> www.foodisyourbestmedicine.com
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2