Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky |
Date: | Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:58:55 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 3/5/02 9:42:21 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> To argue about the issues is only useful when everyone is doing so in
> good faith. An argument is not the same as an apologia, which is what
> this particular person always comes up with. Like a politician, he has
> no genuine interest in getting at the truth, only in concocting a
> plausible sounding justification for the current unjustifiable power
> structure.
>
Truth? Your pretense to a lust for 'truth' is represented by a pursuit of
trivial differences over minutia 'argued' among those who have created a
like-minded comfy little paradigm of non-inquiry beyond which you fear to
tread.
Remain in your bubble if you like, but do not pretend to a superiority you
do not possess.
Yours,
Issodhos
p.s. Don't read this.:-)
|
|
|