Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky |
Date: | Mon, 1 May 2000 20:42:09 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bill Bartlett wrote:
The writer points out that capitalism, which is predicated on and
justified by free competition, inevitably trends toward increased
monopoly, simply by the development of increasingly sophisticated
machinery of production.
Mumpsimus prior
This is nonsense.
There are two types of monopoly; coercive and natural. Natural is
a desired variety as the best product is produced at the best
price -- such has never existed. A coercive monopoly requires the
Government to enforce.
DDeBar wrote:
There is clearly a trend towards monopoly, that is, one producer of the
total supply of a given product. It is, from a production point of view,
more efficient. Also, it is easier to regulate supply and to mitigate
against crisis of overproduction. The government need only do
nothing, and monopolies spring up all over the place.
Name one monopoly that did not require Government enforcement.
Your bible is flawed.
Mumpsimus
_____________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
|
|
|