Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 07:19:35 -0500 |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
it is not my intention to insult - simply a statement that based on your
posts, you
do not seem to understand genetics, from my limited studies.
I have no interest in being an instructor...
Anwar J Goins <[log in to unmask]>@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU> on 11/20/2001
03:08:02 PM
Please respond to Raw Food Diet Support List
<[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Raw Food Diet Support List <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
cc:
Subject: Re: Evolution: just a theory
I don't. Explain how I don't. I know enough to understand this.
But thank you for telling me what I don't know. Nice attempt at shutting
me down, science dictator.
Godbless,
Anwar
Gary Orlando wrote:
>
> >Thanks for that.
>
> you're welcome.
>
> > I don't deny evolution because of a creationist belief,
> because evolution still does not deny God.
>
> a quick reality check denies God.
>
> >However, I think it falls
> short indeed and should not be called a fact.
>
> I don't care whether it's called a fact or not.
>
> >There are faults with it
> which includes the genetic info. problem at the core.
>
> There are faults with all theories that attempt to explain complex
natural
> phenomena.
>
> > There is NO KNOWN
> PROCESS WHICH ADDS NEW INFO TO THE GENETIC CODE. Genetic changes can only
> be blamed on chemical or nuclear influences which are only known to
> damage the genetic code.
>
> you do not understand genetics.
>
> >This is why i say that the explanation of
> variation within species is a better explanation because species evolving
> into other species is NOT a fact, it is an unproven hypothesis with some
> definite holes in it.
>
> Only because you refuse to review the evidence.
>
> > And for something to be proven it can't have such holes in it.
>
> you wouldn't say that if you did not believe in God.
>
|
|
|