Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:26:30 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thank you, Brad. I read the MS article, and indeed it is true. In
Microsoft's infinite wisdom, they decided that the numlock key should be off
whether you want it that way or not. For those not familiar with
NT/Windows2000, the hardware state of the numlock key is independent of the
hardware setting in CMOS. I now feel challenged to change this, but now I
know that it will require system patches to undo what Microsoft did onto us!
Will let you know if I find the way.
Peter Shkabara
____________________________
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
http://gocolumbia.org/shkabarap <http://gocolumbia.org/shkabarap>
-----Original Message-----
After I sent this I looked further and at the bottom of the below mentioned
article is Q217884, which states that the resetting of the num-lock is by
design in W2K Server, so you seem to be stuck.
Brad Loomis
Hi Peter, I looked at MS article Q154529, where it states, NOTE: This
article does not apply to Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server. It also does not
apply to Windows 2000 Server and Windows 2000 Advanced Server running
Terminal Services.. I didn't not find a solution. I didn't look all that
much more, so a more thorough search may reveal a solution for you.
Shop online without a credit card
http://www.rocketcash.com
RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
The NOSPIN Group Promotions is now offering
Mandrake Linux or Red Hat Linux CD sets along
with our NOSPIN Power Linux CD... at a great price!!!
http://freepctech.com/goodies/promotions.shtml
|
|
|