Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:56:13 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From what I understand, Win95,98,ME reads memory from the top down (unlike
Win2k which reads from the bottom up). This would mean that if you are only
caching the first 64MB of RAM, the initial memory that Win95, etc. reads
would not be the same memory that's being cached. This means that you would
have a performance hit.
Also, if memory serves, there was a way on some VX boards to increase the L3
cache to support more memory caching. Getting ahold of the cache RAM to do
this might be a bit of a trick at this stage of the game, though. Good
luck!
Kyle Elmblade
[log in to unmask]
From: "Herbert Graf" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] max memory for VX board
> > I can't remember, but was hoping someone knew right off hand. Is
> > there a memory limitation on a VX motherboard?
> > A friend currently has 64 meg RAM and wants to increase it. He's
> > using Win95, but upgrading to Win98SE. I thought I'd read
> > something somewhere sometime about memory and a VX board. Thanks.
>
> I believe the limit of the VX chipset is about 128 or 256 MB,
however the
> chipset only caches the first 64MB. This means that anything above 64MB
will
> not be level 2 cached. Normally this wouldn't be that huge a problem, but
I
> believe the way win9x handles memory the performance impact is higher than
> the raw numbers would seem to indicate. TTYL
Curious about the people moderating your
messages? Visit our staff web site:
http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html
|
|
|