BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary Krugman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Callahan's Preservationeers"
Date:
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:04:21 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 4/27/2000 9:21:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> I found that the only way to get an
>  architectural firm to start thinking about the site and its context was to
>  reject the first proposal outright, and maybe the second.  They would
>  always come back with better work.

Absolutely!  This has been my experience too. The disdain, however, that some
architects have for outside input is pretty evident. There is something of
the artist's temperament at work -- "I am the artist here .... I know what is
aethetically pleasing and what isn't. But..... if you boobs in the cheap
seats can't recognize greatness when you see it and MUST ruin my fabulous
design in order for my client to get his approvals, well ...  fine!"

Not exactly a stellar starting point, attitude-wise. Probably a defensiveness
arising from all those nasty crits.

-- Sits in the Crow's Nest

ATOM RSS1 RSS2