-

>> removing the overload of toxins out of the daily
>> metabolism by storing in
>> fat cells  is a clear advantage  to maintain the
>> functioning of the body
>> despite an unatural diet.
>
>> so it makes sens to me that a less toxic diet will
>> permit to loose weight.
>
>Interesting thoughts Jean Claude. Are you aware of any
>research in this area?


no i don't know .
you can stop there or read farther.my comments

 BUt i think it is clearly established that we found concentrated amounts of
chemicals that can't be used by the organism in the fats of animals even
when the source of thoses chemicals ( pesticides for ex.) is not so obvious
like in the fat of artic animals. That is demonstrating IMO 1st the
possibility of absorbing completly foreign molecules 2nd,  the incapacity of
the body to eliminate molecules that have not been part  in the genetic
history of the organism chemistry. and the danger of forcing a body to
release them in the blood.
My message is clear ,be glad of your fatty deposits they might save your
life  to a certain degree at least they  buy you some time.
i allways have been unable to make fats for some reason and had been rather
thin but the toxins that i could not deal with,  could  have been stored in
the fatty tissues of my endocrine glands instead , so much that they marked
those cells , triggering the immune system to destroy them.

That is my simplistic  and unscientific understanding of autoimmune
diseases. when the deposits are in the joint you have rhumatoid arthriris,
in the fatty layers of nerves you got MS in the muscles and you have
muscular distrophy ,  . on the walls of arteries  and you got
artherosclerosis. etc...

it si unlikely IMO that you can have scientific papers explicitement
developing those theories because they will have to admit that there is
molecules that could enter the ,metabolic pathways to some degrees and got
stuck in mid path because of the  slightly misshaping of its structure
( the use by scientists of 2-desoxyglucose to understand schizophrenia prove
that misshape molecules can get stuck in the brain cells and accumulate.)
Even the idea that foreign molecules could pass the intestinal; barrier was
strongly opposed not that long ago, so we are not ready to question,  that
maybe we are ingesting molecules that doesn't belong to a human bodies in
the first place .
you wil need to compile scattered informations gathered among many diferents
paper to find the scientific support for that theory

only the intake of denatured molecules can make obese,  a male gorila weight
betwen 140 to 185 kilos , in a zoo they can reach 318 kilos.
even a bear that is programmed to make fat for its survival have a limit in
the wild despite an illimited supply of salmon , in a zoo they get obese
too. EXercise stress  have its part but doesn't explain by itself..
i am very much interested by the subject right now because since i increased
my animal fat intake i am now for the 1st time storing fats. before,  no
matter what was the calory intake i could not do it .( and i allways ate a
lot)
i am postulating that those  specific fatty acids were  needed to  transport
the toxins ( i think it is scientifically establish that fatty acids serve
as carrier for toxins that the liver is unable to break down. )from more
vital organs to fat cells as a temporary device of desintoxification
jean-claude