In a message dated 11/26/2000 5:34:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> Hey, Mary Julep: does the undisclosed presence of a placenta (or 3 of same)
> on the site constitute an illegal concealment of a toxic hazard (or would
> that only be the case in NJ?)
Depends on who the father was, I suppose.
Julep