Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 07:37:16 EST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 3/14/00 7:03:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> I suspect you are right. So the logical conclusion is that the war was
> fought to win the hearts and minds of the US public. It follows that the
> majority of people in the US are "Liberals" who wanted a war against
> Serbia?
Fought?:-) It was engaged in to divert the US public attention from the
Clinton/Gore woes, and, like most people the world over, the majority of
Americans had no real say, no real information, no time, no debate, and were
heavily propagandized over a long period by an interventionist minded
national media and the liberal segment of the American Left (Think of them
as corrupted capitalists with a guilt complex if that helps:-)). The last
point serendiptiously made it possible to quickly act when it became
politically useful to do so.
> "New Left", is that another political party presumably? They would be old
> rightists (in the old lingo) no doubt? ;-)
The New Left was a sociopolitical movement that began in the 60's. Its
followers are now safely entrenched in American academia.
Yours,
Issodhos
|
|
|