BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
"BP - \"lapsit exillas\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Final Exam in Historic Preservation Law
From:
Lawrence Kestenbaum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 May 2000 05:43:01 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<028701bfbb89$d7dc0ea0$6647bc18@leland>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"lapsit exillas\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (16 lines) 
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Leland Torrence wrote:

> "Eminent domain would erase deed restrictions"
> Deed restrictions would not apply to all if eminent domain on any?
> Best,
> Leland

Deed restrictions on the eminent domained property would be void.  Deed
restrictions on the remaining properties subject to the deed restriction
MIGHT be harder to enforce depending on the circumstances, other
applicable law, and how the judge is feeling that morning.

---
Lawrence Kestenbaum, [log in to unmask]
The Political Graveyard, http://politicalgraveyard.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2