BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ken Follett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "lapsit exillas"
Date:
Mon, 15 May 2000 16:54:50 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In a message dated 5/15/00 2:53:27 PM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< ... that they can't type while they're on a swing stage? >>

Sharpshooter,

Well,  truth is that I deceived myself I could write a hell of a lot better
before I learned to spell, and that was only a few years back itself (had to
teach myself with help of the good spelling mate, which I came to prior to
the advent of spelling pocket computers) -- took a lot of getting used to,
the mate and the spelling. Now I spell well and feel I write lousy, and now I
deceive myself that there are a few less red marks on my compositions. But I
do sort of understand stuff about using the comma that I had been missing.
I'm trying to grasp usage of semi-colons. Is good writers the intent of your
question, or good story tellers? I'd rather have a good story spelt poorly
than a boring story spelt well. Least ways, a good story spelt poorly does
not cause a roof to leak.

][<en

ATOM RSS1 RSS2