BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heidi Harendza <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "lapsit exillas"
Date:
Tue, 23 May 2000 12:25:49 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
In a message dated 05/22/2000 5:06:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Any personal experience out there with this policy?  Is it followed in every
>  case?
I definitely think that paint color clauses in HP ordinances spread more
ill-will than any other preservation issue. ("You people aren't going to tell
me what color to paint MY house!") Having said that... microscpic analysis is
the way to go, if one is going to try and enforce a paint clause in an
ordinance: one has to be able to scientifically and historically substantiate
the authenticity of the required paint scheme. I've heard of many legal
problems with paint clauses in HP ordinances.

-Heidi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2