BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
"BP - \"Callahan's Preservationeers\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Edgar Ailing Poe
From:
Lawrence Kestenbaum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:07:26 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"Callahan's Preservationeers\"" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (14 lines) 
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Met History wrote:

> No, I don't prefer the demolition - I like seeing the building where it is.
> And as my post stated, I don't necessarily disagree with Landmark
> designation.  Simply asking the question about how we would "protect" this
> building doesn't indicate opposition to that protection - or does it?

My apologies -- I misunderstood.  I just now reread your original post and
I see now how I misread it.

---
Lawrence Kestenbaum, [log in to unmask]
The Political Graveyard, http://politicalgraveyard.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2